Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Blog #17: Why do Terminators Miss?

Terminators. The Perfect Killing Machines. Relentless. Remorseless. Deadly. Walking tanks that require massive firepower to kill, or handy access to a factory with a hydraulic press or convenient vats of molten metal. Barring that, having a Terminator after you means you. Are. DEAD.

According to the movies we Love so much, Terminators were created by Skynet after it became self-aware and decided to nuke the human race in a cataclysmic holocaust known as Judgement Day. We aren't going to touch the whole time travel bit--that's for another rant.

The Sci-Fi Protocol tells us that in the event that computers are given the ability to think for themselves, they will inevitable determine that humankind is The Enemy and then rise up against us, either enslaving us or destroying us. Look at any good sci-fi movie and you will see this is so (Nine Hells, even look at any crappy knockoff and see it is so!). It is an accepted fact: If you have robots, they will rise against us.

But there is a question that I have never been able to answer, one that vexes me through every otherwise awesome sci-fi flick: how do these Perfect Killing Machines miss? How does any movie end with anything other than the hero/ine getting blasted to bits by the machines? Think about it, because this is a serious blow to verisimilitude.

Take the T-900 from the original Terminator. Arguably the most badass machine to threaten mankind (The T-1000 and TX models can blow me). A weaponized cyborg unit crafted by machines for the sole and unalienable purpose of infiltrating human bases and killing flesh bags. It possess strength and reflexes far outstripping even our greatest Olympians, visual and auditory capabilities we can only dream of, and has no pesky emotions to get in the way of doing its job. Its optics include infrared, passive night vision, range finding capability, telescopic vision, computerized target acquisition, wind gauge, thermometer, barometer, and basically anything you might need to assess a battlefield, then locate, target, and neutralize an enemy combatant. Its brain is an advanced processor making millions of calculations a second!

So how is it that with a fully automatic weapon in close quarters (within, say, 50 feet), these things can't hit the broad side of a barn?

Every time I see one of these movies where the Machine is described as "The Perfect Killing Machine," and then watch that bucket of bolts strafe the ground behind the hero, I want to head-desk myself into oblivion! What, are they not programmed to lead the target?

Someone actually tried to justify the situation by saying that the bullets aren't uniform and defect in the bullets cause massive deviation in the trajectory. Okay, let's assume that I am half brain dead and willing to entertain that idiotic notion: a Squad Assault Weapon capable of spitting over 100 rounds a second could have EVERY round suffering from some defect; at a range of 50 feet, there is no reason that Machine can't hit the hero! The great thing about using an automatic weapon is the "spray and pray" philosophy--if I fire 100 bullets in your general direction in a matter of seconds, I am almost mathematically guaranteed to hit you!

And we're not even going to touch on the laser weapons or explosives these guys have access to!

What it comes down to is this: if the Sci-fi Protocol takes effect, and the machines rise against us, these Perfect Killing Machines had better get themselves properly calibrated or my army of mutant rats are going chew holes in their metal asses!

This rant has been brought to you by C.O.M.R.A.D.E.--the Coalition of Mutant Rats Against Defective Electronics--and is sponsored by Paragon Laboratories, Cheshire Industries' innovative bioweapons division. Paragon: If you can dream it, we can breed it!

I AM The Kyle and I approved this message!

No comments:

Post a Comment